Lengthy disclaimer now out of the way, I would like to talk about one of my favorite novelists/essayists, Walker Percy. He eventually settled in Covington, right near my hometown and lived and wrote there until his death in 1990. A brief background is probably in order, Percy was raised by an uncle, also an author, after the suicide of his father and the death of his mother in a car wreck (which WP seemed to think may also have been a suicide). He then went to UNC, studied medicine, and interned at Bellvue in New York where he caught tuberculosis. His medical career was of course over and while convalescing and reading philosophy in a sanatorium, Percy made two important decisions: he decided to become a writer and he joined the Catholic Church.
Percy drew on his medical background to inform his writing, as he sought to write the diagnostic novel, a book that pointed to the disease of modern society. He noted how the illness as the doctor sees it is in fact the body's response to the latent disease; for example, an infection does not cause a fever or runny nose, the body responds by raising it's temperature and secreting mucus in an attempt to fight off the disease. Thus Percy argued modern depression, malaise, and alienation were not themselves diseases to be treated as such, but signified that something was deeply wrong with man, or society, or man as he finds himself in society.
The problem then is not as simple as "getting over it" or taking increasingly more pills in an effort to cope (not that medication or treatment is bad), but addressing the problems that cause this response of displacement. In fact as Percy says in the book I'm reading now (the satirical, fake self-help book Lost in the Cosmos), something is probably wrong if you are not at least the slightest bit depressed by modern living. Recognizing then by our own response to modern life that something in fact is wrong, that there is a sort endemic disease in man, what is our response? To point to a cure.
The problem is of course we ourselves bear the disease; we are part of the problem. Like Percy as he worked in the sanatorium as a doctor-patient while recovering, even as we work to alleviate the problem we ourselves carry the contagion that is its source. So we ourselves cannot be the cure, we would have, in the end, to destroy ourselves to destroy the disease. But if someone was able to grapple with our disease, bear it, and defeat it, then He would be inoculated, He could cure.
The wounded surgeon plies the steel
That questions the distempered part;
Beneath the bleeding hands we feel
The sharp compassion of the healer's art
Resolving the enigma of the fever chart.
T.S. Eliot- The Four Quartets, East Coker
So a little post-post disclaimer here. I do not mean to say that Jesus makes it all sunshine and smiles or that we do not have a significant part to play in His healing work. If I didn't think Eliot was such a good ending to the post I probably would've explained all this in an extended, rambling paragraph in the post itself. We are stuck somewhere between Easter and the Second Advent, the reconciling work has begun but it will not be completed by human effort. That does not make our efforts futile or absolve us of our responsibility, but makes us dependent upon Christ and to mirror Hims as our wounded healer.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDang it. Now I noticed a typo. It should say in the last sentence "calls us to mirror Him". If the extra s at the end of Him caused you to fear I was some sort of bizarre, multiple-Christ-believing-heretic for a minute I apologize.
ReplyDelete